Tuesday, November 18, 2008

WTVR6 to cover Vanishing Virginia- tonight and tomorrow

Local Richmond Channel 6 will cover "Virginia Vanishing" on November 18th and 19th. Tuesday night at 5:30 and 11 PM, and Wednesday at 5:30, the series Morning Anchor Greg McQuade has spent several months on will show the effects development and sprawl are creating on our state.

Virginia Vanishing Part 1

Virginia Vanishing Part 2




In related news, 390 Acres in Henrico County began the path toward their ultimate preservation.

This would not have happened without the hard work and dedication of our Governor, Tim Kaine,
House Speaker Bill Howell, R-Stafford, and state Sen. Ed Houck, D-Spotsylvania- we appreciate James Lighthizer and CWPT's support. Thank you gentlemen!

Standing as further evidence that rarely except through State, Federal, and private actions, are historic places and open land in Henrico spared development.


BATTLEFIELDS GET HELP
"Virginia awards grants to protect 15 Civil War battlefields, including Chancellorsville and Brandy Station"
Fredericksburg Free-Lance Star By CLINT SCHEMMER

"Virginia stepped forward yesterday to help save portions of 15 Civil War battlefields from encroaching development.

The commonwealth will provide up to $5.2 million to front-line private groups defending Civil War battlefields--including Chancellorsville and Brandy Station. Preservationists must come up with $10.4 million to get the 21 matching grants awarded by the state Department of Historic Resources.

The resulting total, $15.57 million, would be one of the largest sums earmarked for Virginia battlefield preservation in decades.

"I am pleased that we are able to join with these private organizations to save important open spaces and cultural landscapes while we still have the opportunity," Gov. Tim Kaine said of the initiative yesterday.

"Battlefield protection preserves Virginia's historic as well as its natural landscapes. It is an integral part of my administration's goal to protect 400,000 acres of open spaces by 2010."

Tapping the state's Civil War Historic Site Preservation Fund, established by the General Assembly in 2006, the department's grants will save 1,571 acres.

The money comes not a moment too soon, as Virginia and conservationists race to preserve some of the nation's most threatened hallowed ground from urban and suburban growth.

The grants will save key parcels by enabling private organizations to buy parcels or obtain easement rights on land that will stay in private ownership. Those deals will enlarge or join together previously protected battlefield tracts."

"The 15 affected battlefields lie in the counties of Amelia, Appomattox, Culpeper, Frederick, Hanover, Henrico, Louisa, Rockingham, Shenandoah and Spotsylvania.

The sites' military histories are varied, including significant Union and Confederate victories as well as the scenes of horse-mounted battles, such as Brandy Station in Culpeper County--where the largest cavalry fight in North American history was waged.

"These purchases will allow us to secure places with the power to connect us and future generations to the lessons of a defining period of our history," said Kathleen S. Kilpatrick, director of the Historic Resources Department."

"The aid comes as groups across Virginia slate events for the Civil War's sesquicentennial, which begins in 2011." read more


The battlefields saved in Henrico are:

Glendale Battlefield, Henrico County- In June 1862, General Robert E. Lee's army attacked the Union line and surged eastward hoping to isolate half the opposing forces. However late in the day Federal reinforcements counterattacked and held the line. Lee's best opportunity to trap and destroy the Union army was lost. The Civil War Preservation Trust is purchasing four parcels totaling 87.5 acres within the core area of the battlefield. One parcel includes a study area of the First Bottom battlefield, while another one connects to land at Richmond National Battlefield Park on Malvern Hill, resulting in nearly three miles of contiguous protected areas. All four parcels are adjacent to nearly 362 acres of the battlefield already saved by the CWPT.

Malvern Hill, Henrico County- Also known as the Battle of Poindexter's Farm, this July 1, 1862 battle was the sixth and last of the Seven Days Battles of the Union's Peninsula Campaign. Gen. Robert E. Lee launched a series of disjointed assaults on the nearly impregnable Union position on Malvern Hill. The Confederates suffered more than 5,300 casualties without gaining ground. Despite his victory, Union Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan withdrew to entrench at Harrison's Landing on the James River, ending the Peninsula Campaign. The Civil War Preservation Trust's purchase of 178 acres in the core and study area of the Malvern Hill and Glendale Battlefields will secure the site of a historic house and road, and the area where Confederate Gen. John B. Magruder supervised his troops while under fire. Due to significant development in the immediate vicinity of Malvern Hill, the area to be acquired is at high risk for single family, residential development.

First Deep Bottom Battlefield, Henrico County- This July 27–29, 1864 battle was part of the Siege of Petersburg. During the night of July 26 and 27, the Union Army II Corps and two divisions of Gen. Phil Sheridan's cavalry under the command of Maj. Gen. Winfield Hancock crossed to the north side of James River to threaten Richmond, diverting Confederate forces from the impending attack at Petersburg on July 30. Union forces abandoned efforts to turn the Confederate position at New Market Heights and Fussell's Mill after Confederates strongly reinforced their lines and counterattacked. During the night of July 29, the Federals re-crossed the river, leaving a garrison to hold the bridgehead at Deep Bottom. CWPT's purchase will preserve 125 acres entirely within the core area of the battle, specifically a historic farm that was the scene of the heaviest fighting, where total casualties surpassed 800. Because of extensive recent development in the area, this is the only sizeable portion of the July 28 battlefield that can feasibly be saved.


Click here to see the complete list of 15 Civil War battlefields receiving preservation grants announced Monday by the Virginia Department Historic Resources.

Chesterfield Nixes "Downzoning" Back to Ag- Current Henrico Planning will raise taxes too

Henrico states 2026 Comprehensive Plan changes won't "rezone" your land, but local news shows a different pattern altogether. Higher taxes could soon be coming your way, because planning in agricultural areas will have an effect on all districts.

The Henrico Comp Plan FAQ asks and answers the question.

"Will the Comprehensive Plan rezone my property?
No. The Comprehensive Plan only recommends future land uses. Any changes in zoning would still require public hearings by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors."

But Chesterfield Observer coverage shows that a county's Comp Plan is much more than the loose set of guidelines Henrico has been selling ours as.

Changes made to "Land-Use Designations" can raise landowners taxes and start a series of events that could actually create patterns for much more poorly planned future developments.

Once new designations are adopted, many counties will not allow what they call "downzoning" back to agricultural use.

If the FAQ tells us the Comp Plan won't change zoning, how could this be irreversible? Wouldn't it be the same in Henrico as shown in Chesterfield?

So WHY in this economy, with the the real estate and building markets at an all time low, would anyone want their land to hold a higher 'Land Use Designation"?

So you could sell your land at rock-bottom prices?
Or be guaranteed to pay higher taxes?

This aint rocket-science folks.

If you choose to sell your land in the future, the buyer could always apply to re-zone at that time. And in case you haven't noticed- our friendly Henrico Supervisors and Planning Commissioners are usually happy to help a developer.

Even though the Henrico County Comprehensive Planning FAQ points out that Comp Planning
can't "rezone" your land, it actually can. Read how this has happened right next door in Chesterfield.


Chesterfield Observer

"Branner Station faces uncertain future"
November 12, 2008


"The owner of the 1,614-acre Branner Station site is now looking to sell the property. An agent for Thomas Company LLC, which owns the site, met last week with a potential buyer, but the company won't say who is interested or when a decision might be made. Acting on behalf of owner Nina Shoosmith, agent Sonny Currin declined to give details.

Asked if one option is to downzone the property back to agriculture as has been speculated, Currin said, "I don't have any comment on that."

Properties zoned agriculture pay the lowest tax rate. If the property keeps its current residential zoning, real estate taxes will be far higher.

The Chesterfield Planning Department is cool to any revision of the rezoning passed late last year when HHHunt committed to building an offsite road network estimated to be worth $130 million as part of its proposed Branner Station development. The zoning plan included a north-south road connecting to Chestertown Road and then Route 288 and an east-west road to Interstate 95.

"The staff would not support a rezoning back to agriculture because it wouldn't be consistent with the county's comprehensive plan," said Planning Director Kirk Turner.

Turner is also concerned about any plan to break up the parcel and sell it off into smaller developments because the county would likely get the same number of homes without the needed road improvements and land set aside for public facilities. Turner said that was his impression of what happened when the county allowed Greensprings development to split after Investor Management Group went bankrupt.

The 1988 Greensprings rezoning called for 2,300 single-family homes on 1,300 acres north of the Swift Creek Reservoir. In 1995, the late Bernard Savage amended the rezoning for land along Woolridge Road which extends between Genito Road and Old Hundred Road and now includes the Edgewater community. While the amended rezoning did include some road improvements, the county lost right-of-way for the Powhite Parkway if it is ever extended. In 2002, Doug Sowers received approval for similar amendments for the other portion of Greensprings.

Late last month, HHHunt suspended its plans to buy the Thomas Company property and build Branner Station with 2,449 singlefamily homes, 1,331 condos and townhouses, 908 apartments, 300 assisted living units and 470,000 square feet of office and retail development over about 20 years. One of the premier builders in the Richmond metro, HHHunt has built Charter Colony (1,800 homes) in Chesterfield, Wyndham (2,600 homes) and Wellesley (800 homes) in western Henrico County and other planned communities.

But when HHHunt requested an extension of its contract to purchase the land, the Thomas Company declined. With a housing slowdown and tightening credit, HHHunt Vice President/General Manager Dan Schmitt said the company couldn't move ahead at this time, but with a three-year investment so far, he hoped HHHunt could in the future.

Though Branner Station was rezoned on a controversial 2-1 board of supervisors' vote, a group of citizens continues to fight the development. The Bermuda Advocates for Responsible Development has focused on the road network outside the community that might displace 100 families where the eastwest road connector is planned to Interstate 95. The county's thoroughfare plan has the road going near Carver Middle School and Harrowgate Elementary School. HHHunt was doing engineering studies when it ceased work on the project."

Nice work Mr. Pearson!

So there you go. Henrico is following the same pattern right now.

Property can be given a higher density "Land Use Designation", be bought, the economy bottoms out, no building goes on, and TAXES ARE HIGHER.

Henrico's current "Land-Use Plan" draft will also remove residents right to place their land in "conservation easements" in many areas of the county.

If the draft is adopted, you can't "go back".


Not if it's better for the environment,

Not if it would create less sprawl...
not.

Because once the big machine gets rolling, there is no reverse.

Write your Supervisor today, and tell them why

"This is wrong for Henrico."

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Varina District "Unofficial" 2008 Election Results by Precinct (..Henrico too)

As a 'Special Feature' we're providing some links and images that will allow readers to check out the "unofficial" Henrico results of the 2008 Presidential Election.

Each Varina District Precinct's "unofficial results" are shown below. Just scroll down and click your precinct's image for a closer view.

Our focus is on the Varina District, so if you live in Brookland, Fairfield, Three-Chopt or Tuckahoe, click the main link to results to see your district's precinct results.

Henrico's Precincts:
A helpfully interactive verison of the map above is available via the Henrico Registrar's Office, if you want to check out your own precinct all close-up and personal, and learn your own boundaries.

The Registrar's version allows users to mouse-over each precinct to see its name, and each one can be clicked to bring up an expanded close-up in a separate window. This is of use to residents from all 5 Henrico Districts who want to see themselves on the county map, and understand their surroundings.


As of November 5th, 2008 the following "unofficial results" were given for each of the Varina District, Henrico County,Virginia Precincts:

501 Antioch (click to view larger)

502 Cedar Fork (click to view larger)

503 Chickahominy (click to view larger)

504 Donahue (click to view larger)

505 Dorey Park (click to view larger)

506 Eanes (click to view larger)

507 Elko (click to view larger)

508 Highland Springs (click to view larger)

509 Laburnum (click to view larger)

510 Masonic (click to view larger)

511 Mehfoud (click to view larger)

512 Montrose (click to view larger)

513 Nine Mile (click to view larger)

514 Pleasants (click to view larger)

515 Sandston (click to view larger)

516 Sullivans (click to view larger)

517 Town Hall (click to view larger)

518 Whitlocks (click to view larger)

519 Rolfe (click to view larger)

District 3 Absentee (click to view larger)

This map borrowed from MSNBC.com We promise to return it some day.

Varina Antioch Cedar Fork Chickahominy Donahoe Dorey Park Eanes Elko Highland Springs Laburnum Masonic Mehfoud Montrose Nine Mile Pleasants Rolfe Sandston Sullivans Town Hall Whitlocks 2008 General Election Elections Biden McCain Obama Palin Henrico Election Precinct Precincts Results

Saturday, November 1, 2008

HENRICO'S FUTURE...

It's Varina’s Future too-
The future of our county is quietly being planned without reflecting residents input
concerning the need for agricultural "developmental rights" programs..

Let your Supervisor know now!
The 2026 Comprehensive Planning "process" is not complete
without in depth focus on resident's planning input.

"Best Practices" does not mean
planning
behind closed doors
.

...IF YOU LIVE IN THE COUNTY BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT TO LIVE IN THE CITY, THEN DON'T SUPPORT COUNTY OFFICIALS AIMS TO MAKE HENRICO AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT.

On November 12th, 2008, Henrico County's Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission will 'review' input given thus-far by residents on the 2026 Comprehensive Plan "draft".

This is the plan that has been created by county officials and their paid consultants to set the pattern for how Henrico will grow during the next 18 years. Never heard about the plan?


Not surprising,
because our officials have put forth only the minimum effort required by law (plus a
tiny bit more... say $2,300) to educate residents that the Comprehensive Plan exists.

Even though Henrico's scientific "2005 Citizen Survey" showed
71% of those polled didn't even know what the "Land-Use Plan" is.

Shouldn't a survey result like that show the county that they need
to tell residents what they're up to?

Did you know that Henrico's "Zip-Code Campaign"
cost the county over 106 thousand dollars?

And $2,300 is all they'll spend out of the 2008 one billion dollar Henrico budget to advertise and educate us about the plan for our county's future?

Does this make it seem like they want us to know about "their" plan?

So we're encouraging Henrico residents to let our county officials know that

None of us moved here to watch every square
inch of Henrico become "developed"


None of us moved here to watch
bulldozers destroy forests and farmland

There is enough traffic already, focus on the need for alternative
and mass transit prior to encouraging more development, please.

Henrico contains many "aging neighborhoods" that deserve attention and repairs- prior to the county focusing on further aiding developers to "build-out" farmed and forested areas.

Current residents 'quality of life' deserves as much attention as those who aim to keep developing Henrico for profit. (Isn't our environment worth more than that?)

If all of our neighboring counties and the City of Richmond each involve their residents in planning. So WHY hasn't Henrico?

Let your Supervisor know that the current "2026" Comprehensive Planning "process"
is not complete without residents participation.

...any resident of Henrico can voice this concern- whether you live in Varina or not- because the decisions Supervisors are making will affect all Henrico residents. And if you don't care about the environment, then what about your taxes?

because farmed and forested tracts in Varina actually keep
other districts taxes lower... got your attention now?

* want a free bumpersticker like the one above?
want to find out about the future of your taxes
in Henrico? read on.


This May 2026 Comp Plan meetings began. Henrico did only the minimum to advertise them, so don't be surprised if you didn't hear about them.

Please take the time to educate yourself and neighbors about Henrico's current 2026 Comprehensive Plan 'draft', which suggests the urbanization of many green areas in Henrico.

To find out if your neighborhood would be affected, look at the 2010 and 2026 Land-Use and Major Thoroughfare links in the right column. Compare the two and see the changes being desined for your area (without your input).

You can get up to speed by reading this blog, joining 'Envision Henrico' (it's free) and spreading the word to other Henrico residents. Tell them our future depends on it.

Ask yourself: how much "development" is too much? Because

the future of our county is quietly being planned without reflecting public input.

* * * * * * *
Some Stats:

2004 Department of Environmental Quality reports made public the fact that many Henrico watersheds have high 'tmdl' counts.

In Varina, they reported that over 60% of the watersheds are polluted.
Similar patterns exist in other Henrico districts. Non-profits and residents have been volunteering to change this for several years now. We need County planned watershed cleanup programs started now.

Henrico currently has no ordinances planned to prevent "light pollution". One solution would be a simple as requiring all exterior lighting in new developments and businesses to be down-turned to face the ground.

Henrico County has still not taken the opportunity to join the Cool Cities- Cool Counties campaign, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Other surrounding areas have, but not Henrico.

'Cost of Community Services Analysis' or 'COCS' (which Henrico should make public, under the Freedom of Information Act) show that each acre of open-space, forest or farmland requires less tax burden for the creation of necessary infrastructure, than each acre of residential, commercial, or industrial-use land does.

Each acre of residential, commercial, or industrial-use land requires additional financial input from the county. That means Henrico has to spend more than each tax dollar which residents pay into county coffers to support development than to preserve open-space, forested or farmed land. This may be the reason behind the county's marketing itself as a prime location for business developments to be built by the Chinese.

OPEN SPACE IN HENRICO HELPS KEEP RESIDENTS TAXES LOW.

But as outlined in the Richmond-Times Dispatch on April 9th, 08, in 'Development Debated at Session'. The article subtitled "Speakers, supervisors offer explanations about growth impact".

County officials 'explained' that they don't ask developers to pay 'proffers' (like other counties) which would help foot the bill for local infrastructure (schools, roads, firestations, etc) made necessary by new development, because instead:

Henrico plans to keep revenues rising by supporting more and more 'economic development'. If developers don't 'pay in' to support the infrastructure needed for each 'housing unit' they build, then doesn't that mean development is increasing your taxes? Don't let them fool you.
Yes it does.

Sure- we all need jobs, but do you want commercial and retail establishments to be built IN your neighborhood? What about high-rise buildings?

Because those are among the guidelines for growth that the 2026 Plan 'draft' will set for many areas of Henrico.

..this list could go on and on, but if you clicked the 'Varina's Future' tab above to find out what you can do, check out Envision Henrico. They aren't asking for money. It's free and takes little effort on your part. You could sign a petition, or attend the upcoming Henrico Comprehensive Plan "hearings". Voice your support for a sustainable future.

Get involved in keeping Henrico the kind of county you would want your children and grandchildren to live in in the future.


If you have no children or grandchildren, then come share some of your time, and help us build a brighter future- while surrounded by like-minded residents who will be happy to meet you.

Thanks for your time. Now: talk with your neighbors, call or write your district Supervisor asap, and help spread the word!

* * * * * * * *

again...IF YOU LIVE IN THE COUNTY BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT TO LIVE IN THE CITY, THEN DON'T LET THE COUNTY BECOME AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT!

...and if you'd like a bumpersticker like the "Farmland Lost is Farmland Lost Forever"one shown above, click here to visit The Piedmont Environmental Council (the sticker is free, just sign up for PEC environmental email alerts- and you'll feel great about your small part in protecting our Virginia's environment)

Monday, October 27, 2008

Henrico County- willfully neglecting residents planning input ?

County spends 106k on 'Henrico Zip', and next to 'ZIP'
on publicizing the 2026 Comp-Plan
-the plan that will decide the fate of our county into the future-
As reported by Melodie Martin in today's Richmond Times-Dispatch, the financial figures are close to correct. Henrico's Zip-Code campaign costs total over 106,000 dollars, and advertisement for the Comprehensive Plan was at a little over 2,300 dollars as of last week.

Henrico has spent 46 times more on their 'zip-code campaign' than on advertising the Comp-Plan. 46 times more (in what, under a year -vs- what has been spent making the Comp Plan 'public' in three years? or is it five now?)


Couldn't some of that 5 million dollars 'saved' by the zip code changes be spent on publicizing the need for resident's involvement in their own futures?

Read about it in Virginia's number one newspaper:

"More public input urged on land-use plan
Henrico group wants residents more involved in shaping of proposal
"
By MELODIE N. MARTIN TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER

if you want part of the story..

It's not just the 'land-use plan, Ms. Martin. And not just "some residents", or "Henrico group" as keeps being written. The number of interested parties continue to grow as residents find out about what they have quietly been excluded from. What about an RT-D Poll?

The press only falls a little short of covering the whole story. If this was really accurate it would be good reporting.


What's wrong with the RT-D coverage? Well- Martin got some numbers together, but the 2300 dollars mentioned wasn't just money spent on promoting Henrico's Open-House meetings held in May to teach residents about the current "land-use plan".

Ms. Martin: the Comp-Plan in Henrico covers much more than just 'land-use'. It also includes transportation and rec&parks/open-space planning. It will be used as the pattern for planning our county for the next 18 years. So it's not just about "some meetings last spring", as you wrote. It's about Henrico not educating residents about planning for the future of our entire county.

The 'Zip vs. ZIP' numbers came right from Henrico County itself, too. Looks like all that took was a resident writing in to ask. (We shoulda thought of that ourselves.) Hat-tip to that moxiefied lady- and those who took the time to spread that news around, and- OK, thanks to Ms. Martin- for putting it right up front.

Here's the deal: over the weekend HV got email stating the 2300 bucks is the total amount Henrico has spent publicly promoting the Comp Plan to date. Alotta phone calls ensued. We were writing a group post when the RT-D story broke today. (golly- scooped by the RT-D- we must be slipping.)

Hard to believe HC only spent 2300, because the "2005 Citizen Survey" must have set the county back some dough, but then- that's money wasted anyway, because it's obvious Henrico Planners haven't used those survey results in writing the plan either.

And, um, that survey said that
"71% of Henrico residents who responded to the survey on which future planning in Henrico is based said they were not familiar with the "Land Use Plan"."

If Henrico spends only 2300 dollars to "get the word out", do you think that number will change?

How can you tell that residents are not interested in being part of planning for their own future if they don't even know that planning has been going on?

What about covering the Comp-Plan on Henrico's TV channel? Wouldn't that be cheap?

Instead of entertaining us with regurgitated national news feeds, or covering pet-adoption and small-town 20th century history... what about educating residents about our county's future, and THEIR PLACE IN IT?


Henrico's Comprehensive Plan is the equivalent of Richmond's "Master Plan". The Master Plan received front page coverage time and again from the RT-D and involved input from thousands of city residents. Involved meaning "planners based the plan on what residents asked for."

This also isn't just about Lynn Wilson, and her concerns (which she has right to, by the way). There are plenty of other Henrico residents who have an opinion about this. But coverage is making it look like she's the only one who cares. Would you like a list of people to write about?

The sign in sheet from any of the county meetings usually has some Henrico residents names on it.


If you listen to what residents say in public meetings, and write down their names.. you can contact them and ask what they think too! That's sorta the definition of reporting, huh?

At this point in the 'draft' process- as Henrico resident Lynn Wilson aptly pointed out in Martin's short work, there aren't any residents at the table with Henrico Officials and county planners. Those extra chairs have been filled by developers.

Those extra chairs our tax dollars pay for. The "Comp Plan draft" (that doesn't reflect Henrico residents concerns) that our tax dollars pay for is being created for and by people who may not even reside in Henrico.

To create profit for developers with the assistance of our "pro-development" elected officials.


What about creating a committee of residents? It could be weighted for the areas in which most change is proposed. Like the 'scientifically administered 2005 Citizen Survey', which didn't reflect residents from such areas- so um, the results aren't really scientific are they?

We hear residents can still take that survey on the Planning Website, so go for it!
CLICK HERE to be involved in your own future.

So why don't RT-D's editors reckon Henrico Planning warrants coverage? Hard to say- but for weeks at a time the only coverage the Varina District gets is either from sports scores or violent crime.

There's a big story here- if the paper would just listen.


Psssst! RT-D: Henrico comprises a large portion of the 'Richmond Region'.. your own excellent writer Will Jones used to cover that. Ask him, he understands environmental impacts, sprawl, pollution, and all of the other issues our local government should be addressing during the current lull.


Hopefully, during the time between now and the Supervisors/Planning Commission 'review' of residents input, people across Henrico will take the time to contact their supervisor and let them know: Comprehensive Planning should not be done behind closed doors.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Contact your Henrico Supervisor today, tell them you want to know more about Comp-Planning, and ask that your input be made public record while you're at it.. ask that your letter or email be read in the upcoming November "review of residents input."

You should cc: Virgil Hazelett (our county Manager) and the
Melodie N. Martin too.

Maybe then you could be involved in your favorite past-times
without feeling so danged guilty

Friday, October 17, 2008

SHAME, SHAME!! Henrico Ignores Request for Further Public Comp Planning Meetings



Care about the future of Henrico County?





After the 250+ turn-out at Varina Town Meeting on September 15th, instead of responding to Varina (and Henrico) resident's requests for further public inclusion in the Comprehensive Planning process, Henrico officials remain silent.

...just in case you didn't know, Henrico County is in the midst of re-writing our county's "Comprehensive Plan", the land-use, transportation and recreation plan that will guide Henrico's growth for the next 18 years.

During the past year, residents from across the county have attended meetings, written letters, made phone calls, passed out flyers, and tried to educate their friends and neighbors about the importance of the 2026 Comprehensive Plan.

It is actually Henrico's "job" to encourage citizen-involvement and public process, but as Henrico officials have repeatedly been quoted as being "pro-development", county planning disclosure and public education have been slim at best.

The HV team has received emails from residents who cannot access the comprehensive plan online (due to large file sizes,) and many have also complained that the few public meetings that have been held were under-advertised, or that residents received notices by mail days after meetings took place. Yet thousands of tax dollars were spent on the "Zip Code War".

The Bottom Line:
Henrico County is only meeting the minimum requirements for "public inclusion" in this all-important planning process. Land-use, Transportation and Open-Space planning should reflect the desires of local residents, not just developers and elected officials. Residents have been polled, written letters, sent in petitions and requests, and participated with suggestions, without any noticeable impact.

So, it's our residents' job to "keep the ball rolling"

PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO ADDRESS THE NEED FOR RESIDENTS' INCLUSION
IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS
BY CONTACTING YOUR SUPERVISOR.

...In light of Richmond City Council's unanimous passage of the city's "Master Plan" last Monday night, Henrico County is left looking like the underdog for sure.

Richmond's Master Plan was broadly advertised and most public meetings were "standing room only". Planners seemed amazed that residents begged continued inclusion, which by the way, they were given. Residents suggestions and desires were openly discussed and written right into each draft of the Plan.

Richmonders got what they wanted for the future of our capitol by remaining included, but in the city, planners and council persons welcomed, invited, and adopted this valuable input.


The key points requested by Cap-Dwellers are not at all different from what Henrico residents have asked for- and been ignored. The large crowd that gathered Monday at City Hall repeated their support and praise of Richmond City Planners inclusion of strong planning supporting:

•
Focus on the James River; for public access and conservation of the ecological gem that residents love

•
Further revitalization of neighborhoods, as past planning has been so successful • Continued preservation of Richmond's valued architectural and historic assets

•
A Tree Planting Program to keep the city cool and green and over, and over:

• Support for protection of the Libby Hill Park 'view-shed' (the view of the James River that caused William Byrd to name what is now our Capitol after England's Richmond on the Thames)

Yet in Henrico, we have......... MORE DEVELOPMENT
Are you surprised?


In September, to address this 'oversight?', a committee of Varina property owners met with Supervisor James B. Donati, Jr., and asked that current county design of the 2026 Comprehensive Plan (draft) actually "involve" the public. What a novel idea! Including local residents in the future of their own county? The last Varina Town Meeting was used for this purpose. To find out what happened, read our

September 16th post:
Henrico Hears Varina, But Will The County Listen?

Long story short, about 250 residents packed the Henrico Theatre on a weeknight, with little forewarning, and over 80 stayed until after 10pm to have their comments heard. A groundswell of support for the issues important to our District's future were given (again) by residents, who concurred during a work-group exercise:

Preservation Planning and Follow-Through is needed for:

• Our District's ecological assets: fields, forests, and watersheds through open-space planning, and the creation of PRD, TDR, and Easement Programs. Don't remove our land rights!

•
Varina's rural and agricultural character, through proper land-use and transportation planning

•
Strong ordinances needed to protect Historic Sites and Structures, Archeological Sites, Cemeteries and Battlefields

•
That Henrico follow through on prior promises to create buffered scenic corridors: 'The James River Corridor', 'The Osborne Turnpike Corridor' among others.

• Repeatedly requested Cycling and Pedestrian Path Network, to keep residents and tourists safely off the shoulder of our roads

Planning for and the creation of:

• Infrastructure (schools, roads, sewers, fire-support, libraries, and parks) which need to be addressed PRIOR to further development

• Evaluation of, and additions to Varina's long neglected school systems

• Mass Transit systems, to stave off the traffic disaster now occurring in the West End

•
Addressing existing problems which have been repeatedly promised and yet not acted upon, including existing drainage, school, and roadway problems.

But how will these requests be met in the 2026 Comprehensive Plan Draft?
Or will they be addressed at all?

In early October, a committee of Varina residents and landowners contacted our supervisor and asked again for more public meetings to address the 2026 Comp-Plan Draft.

The result? We've all called around, asked questions and have heard- that weeks have passed and there has been no response.

What will become of Varina in the future? Why do you choose to live here? Remember, when you hear the words "Land Rights", that developers should be held to sustainable requirements. "Land Rights" should apply to the current residential base too. Sprawl is not inevitable, as county studies show. Responsible action can be taken to address our environment and the protections our historic and agricultural resources warrant. Residents of all Henrico districts would benefit from the planning necessary to preserve out valued assets.


Tell Henrico Officials:
"DON'T 'SHORTPUMP' VARINA!"
KEEP VARINA BEAUTIFUL


DON'T LET THEM TELL YOU THAT PRESERVING OPEN-SPACE
WILL "COST" OTHER DISTRICTS,
OR RAISE EVERYONE'S TAXES...

IT'S A KNOWN FACT:

OPEN SPACE COSTS ALL RESIDENTS AND THE COUNTY
LESS IN SPENDING PER TAX DOLLAR
THAN THE CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT
HENRICO COUNTY OFFICIALS OPENLY SUPPORT.



Please pass the word now.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Recession, Secession, Regression: Henrico will recede further from forward-thinking neighbors, if left unchecked

So much news- so fast. How will Henrico officials keep up with how far behind they're causing the county to fall?

As hard as it may be to believe, residents care more about quality of life than Fitch rates when they choose their homes.

First off, last Wednesday "Virginia's own" Governor Timothy Kaine paid a visit to "a Henrico Farm" (which our moles report to belong to a Mr. Nelson. Hat tip to you, Sir,).


Standing in Henrico soil, Kaine announced the findings of a farm-fresh Va. agri/forestry study. The work on paper was issued by a fair fellow, Terrance Repphan of UVA's Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, and showed that agri/forestry industries in Virginia had an output of $79 billion in 2006 and supported more than a half-million jobs in the Commonwealth.

Some pretty accurate maps were released recently by the RRPC, graphically detailing among other things, the current state of land-use in the within the Richmond region.



Feeling a little (eh-hem) GRAY? Further evidence of the need to support open-space, preserve farms and forests, create tree canopy retention ordinances, preserve what's left.

Gray shown denotes 'urban' areas which have grown far too much to keep ignoring... far too much for the results of the 2005 Henrico Citizen Survey to be swept under the rug..



Residents of Henrico have been asking our elected officials, their consultants, their planners, for some 20 odd years now to look ahead in terms of land-use. See the yield and stop signs being waved. Well gas prices are up, there 'aint no mass transit to speak of here, and if you look around. you'll see you can't stifle residents concerns for much longer, without some serious questions being asked.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Whiplash! Send your neck braces to Henrico County!
...or have their heads even turned? Perhaps they just don't "get" the news?

As mentioned in today's RT-D article on the "secession", "Mail sent to county government offices should use this address:Henrico County, P.O. Box 90775, Henrico, VA23273-0775."

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

If you're having a hard time keeping up, these links are guaranteed to help:


"Henrico secedes from Richmond mailing address today"
Wednesday, Oct 01, 2008
Richmond Times-Dispatch (no byline, so blanket thanks for that verb)

"Henrico County mailing addresses that use Richmond, VA, will switch today to Henrico, VA. The county will implement a new address for residents, businesses and other entities."
read more here

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


"Public hears about land-use plan
Among new proposals... is suspending growth in western area"

Monday, Sept 22, 2008
Richmond Times-Dispatch
From the dust-free keys of Wesley P. Hester (whom we thank sincerely)
(Chesterfield County)

"Among the new proposals discussed last night is establishment of a "growth management boundary" in the western portion of the plan area. Within that boundary -- generally north of Beach Road and west of state Route 288 -- residential development would be suspended until schools, transportation and public safety can better accommodate growth.

Some residents said the county staff seemed reluctant to incorporate levels-of-service standards in the plan for roads, schools and public safety as requested by the Board of Supervisors.

The standards would require that developers address the impact of new homes before building.

While planning staff, school administrators and fire-rescue officials have voiced support for the concept, they have suggested it should be implemented on a countywide basis and not in isolation.

Planning Director Kirk Turner conceded that the standards likely will be part of the finished Swift Creek product.

"There's no doubt in my mind that levels of service will be included in this plan," he said."
read more here

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

*It's also interesting to note here, that as of August 13th, 2008, suit has been filed against the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors.

"Eleven property owners on Mt. Hermon and Lacy Farms roads have sued the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors over the newly enacted Upper Swift Creek Plan (USCP) adopted six weeks ago to control growth and phosphorous runoff into the Swift Creek Reservoir."

"...The suit called the published notices prior to the plan's adoption "defective and failed to meet statutory requirements [for] applicable notices and give reasonable, fair and required notice under Virginia law." The suit alleges the notices did not identify the affected plan area and notify property owners of whether their properties might be impacted."
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

"Where the Grass is Greener
In the region’s big land grab, property owners are discovering that when it comes to protecting their land, there are other forces at play. ."
Style Weekly Cover Story
July 16, 2008
From our own fair Nicole Anderson-Ellis (too bad she's "taken" already.. Mmmph!)

"Between 1990 and 2006 Henrico County lost 16 percent of its residual farms and forests — what the county calls “vacant land.” ...

...“People want this,” he continues. “They want to preserve our rural heritage.” At public hearings on the new plan, the only opposition to the conservation district was “that it should go further,” Hodges says, “that we haven’t set aside enough.”

Henrico County residents seem to feel the same. “I’ve never had anybody come up to me and say I’m happy they put that new subdivision up,” says Ray Jernigan, chairman of the Henrico County Planning Commission.

In 2005 the county conducted a survey in which 82 percent of respondents said they “support further restricting or managing new development in rural areas.” This value is reflected in county planning documents’ frequent references to “preserving rural character,” but concrete steps to preserve green space are hard to find, and county officials speak of suburban sprawl as a natural and unavoidable process.

And when asked about the limits Henrico’s proposed plan would put on property owners’ right to get conservation easements, (Ray) Jernigan, (chairman of the Henrico County Planning Commission) voices surprise. “So if it shows SR1 [suburban residential 1], you can’t put it in conservation?” he asks.

“I’ve never heard that. I’d like to find out about that.”

read more here

HOW CAN THIS BE? THE CURRENT CHAIR OF OUR PLANNING COMMISSION DOESN'T KNOW THE COMP PLAN WILL MAKE IT VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR HENRICO RESIDENTS TO PUT THEIR OWN LANDS IN CONSERVATION EASEMENTS?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

"Developing the Dead
As counties face rapid suburban development, there’s one hurdle that can come back to haunt — backyard cemeteries."
September 24, 2008
Style Weekly
by Amy Biegelsen (note our appreciation)

"Rachel Lipowicz, who specializes in locating unmarked cemeteries, says developers often must build around them.

As suburban counties swell with new roads, new houses, new strip malls and schools, farms and fields are becoming subdivisions. Of the many hurdles such growth presents, perhaps the most sensitive — and trickiest — is how to deal with long-forgotten, and often unmarked, cemeteries.

That word, “preservation,” is telling. Like historic building preservationists that challenge new development in the city, the historical society has become integrated into the county’s zoning process. The Chesterfield Planning Department keeps the society in the loop on new projects by sending it plans for land that may harbor burial sites."
read more here

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Associated Press
"Study: Va.'s farms, forests generate big dollars"
09.24.08
By Steve Szkotak (with our many thanks)

RICHMOND, Va. -
"A University of Virginia study of farming and forestry found the two had a total economic impact of $79 billion in 2006 and supported more than a half-million jobs in the commonwealth.

The study identified agriculture's share of the $79 billion as $55 billion, up from a 1998 estimate of $36 billion.

The $79 billion figure does not include agritourism and horse events, which have the potential to add several billion dollars, the study said. It does not include recreational hunting and fishing or commercial fishing, a growing segment of the Virginia economy."
read more here

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

"500,000 in Virginia Work in Agriculture, Study Says"
Thursday, September 25th, 2008
(with our thanks to)
Julian Walker of
The Virginian-Pilot

"Their report estimated that the two industries provide 500,000 jobs in the state, more than 10 percent of the available labor force.

While the numbers sound impressive, other figures raise alarms about the future vitality of the state's farm and forestry businesses. Virginia had more than 8.5 million acres of farmland as of 2007 but 200,000 fewer acres than in 2000, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Total wooded acres are declining after decades of reforestation efforts in Virginia.

Kaine, who announced the U.Va. study's findings Wednesday, set a goal to conserve 400,000 acres of undeveloped land, including forests, during his four years as governor. The state should meet that goal and "make some headway back against development pressures that are taking land out of operation," Kaine said."
read more here

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

"Virginia Farms and Forests have Huge Impact on Economy"
September 24, 2008
Props to 19News wcav-tv (where charlottesville news comes first)

"These numbers were good news that the Governor was talking about. But, he also pointed out that land continues to be consumed by suburban sprawl. Taking away tens of thousands of acres away, which was previously used for this natural resource production," said Terry Rephann, the lead researcher in this study conducted by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service.

Governor Kaine also said that there are challenges that lie ahead for the industries, but they can be dealt with by installing proper land preservation policy and research."
read more here


So stop for a minute and take a look around: at Governor Kaine's recent announcement, at how other areas deal with sprawl, at the list of requests you might usually ignore, and you'll notice:

It's time to listen.